Item# S8445

Simplicity Pattern 8445 Misses' Vintage Blouses and Cummerbund




Product Actions

Add to cart options

Additional Information

Step back in time with a Misses' 1950s vintage blouse with cummerbund pattern by Simplicity. The front and collar are cut in one, the back is gathered to a deep yoke and features kimono sleeves. Long sleeves are gathered to a pointed cuff, three-quarter sleeves are gathered to sleeve bands with turned back cuffs, and the short sleeves have cuffs. Simplicity sewing pattern. Available as a printable pattern—for more information, see Printable Sewing Patterns.

Item(s) added to the shopping cart!

View Shopping Cart Continue Shopping

Item(s) added to your Favorites!

View Favorites Continue Shopping
Simplicity Pattern 8445 Misses' Vintage Blouses and Cummerbund is rated 1.0 out of 5 by 3.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from GREAT LOOK - POOR PATTERN I actually came to the site to see if it was just me. The one review I saw stated the same problem I am having- the neck line. I was attempting view C, which had 6 pieces. I am thinking there should have been 8- a separate collar and a separate sleeve. I loved the look so much that I purchased 2 patterns. I am wondering if I can return the unused one.
Date published: 2018-01-05
Rated 1 out of 5 by from I found this pattern tobe very difficult to sew. I am not a novice to sewing, however, I never could get the neckline to match with the collar. Poorly designed due to the way the collar and neck facing is done; not to mention the sizes given. Different directions for different sizes. Will not match up and hard to sew.
Date published: 2017-10-21
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Do NOT buy this pattern! I bought this pattern because I liked the style. In fact, I cut out two fabrics for two blouses. WHAT A WASTE!! Not only in time but a lot of money was wasted because the collar and facing don't match, the instructions showed methods that didn't work. I am not a novice seamstress...I'm 67 years old and have been sewing since high school. I have never had a problem with Simplicity patterns, which is why they were my preferred pattern...not anymore.
Date published: 2018-06-08
  • y_2018, m_6, d_21, h_4
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_3
  • loc_en_US, sid_S8445, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_simplicitycom